Case 1300453/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Ennis – Solicitor For the v Mr J Hart - Director — 2020
- Case reference
- 1300453/2020
- Decision date
- 30 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Signed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Ennis – Solicitor For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an order following a preliminary hearing at Birmingham on 30 October 2020 before Employment Judge Self Signed. The tribunal recorded that Mr J Lister was, at all material times, an employee of Drakestown Properties Limited for the purposes of the unfair dismissal and redundancy payment claims under the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal also recorded that he was, at all material times, a worker engaged by the respondent for the purposes of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The judgment does not contain any merits findings on dismissal, redundancy entitlement, or working time breaches.
The case was resolved by agreement. The judgment states that the respondent shall pay £4,000 in full and final settlement of all heads of claim made under claim number 1300453/2020 to the claimant or his representative.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was an employee for the purposes of the unfair dismissal and redundancy payment claims, but the case was resolved by agreement rather than a merits determination. | Settled | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant was an employee for the purposes of the redundancy payment claim, but the case was resolved by agreement rather than a merits determination. | Settled | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claimant was a worker for the purposes of the Working Time Regulations 1998, but the case was resolved by agreement rather than a merits determination. | Settled | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.