Case 1300464/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Atanasova v Bespoke Global Resourcing Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1300464/2020
- Decision date
- 28 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Findlay
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Atanasova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Findlay dealt with the claim on the papers. The tribunal recorded that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £1,460.36, expressed in the judgment as £1,333.36 + £127.00.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £444.77 gross. No separate findings on liability reasoning beyond the Rule 21 judgment were set out in the extracted text.
The judgment records two monetary awards only. No additional remedy heads, interest, or split of the awards beyond the two stated sums are set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and orders payment of the gross sum of £1,333.36 + £127.00 = £1,460.36. | Upheld | — | £1,460 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and orders payment of £444.77 gross. | Upheld | — | £445 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,905
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.