Case 1300548/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Mr C Rebbeck (Managing Director) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1300548/2021
- Decision date
- 1 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gaskell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Fiona Tsang, a solicitor, was employed by HRS Family Law Solicitors Limited from 23 March 2020 and dismissed summarily on 12 October 2020 after being told to move from the Dudley office to Walsall. The respondent said she was dismissed for gross misconduct and was not entitled to notice pay; the claimant sought notice pay, holiday-related sums, pension contributions and bonus-related sums.
Employment Judge Gaskell held that the respondent had a contractual right to require an employee to work at another office, but that the contract also implied proper consultation and consideration of the employee’s concerns before that right was enforced. The claimant had attended the Dudley office on 12 October 2020 and continued working, and when she explained that she was upset by the earlier telephone conversation and wanted to continue the discussion by email, the tribunal found that her conduct did not amount to a fundamental or repudiatory breach of contract. The tribunal said that if the respondent wanted to dismiss her that day, it needed to do so with full contractual notice.
The tribunal therefore upheld the wrongful dismissal claim and awarded £6,075 net. The award comprised £4,048 unpaid notice pay, £625 loss of holiday pay during the notice period, £187 loss of pension contributions, and a £1,215 uplift under section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 because the respondent had failed to deal with the matter in accordance with the ACAS Code. The tribunal rejected the bonus claim, found no adverse finding on mitigation because the respondent had not proved a failure to mitigate, and made no award for holiday pay said to have accrued before dismissal because the evidence on that issue was too vague.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant was wrongfully dismissed in breach of contract. It awarded net damages of £6,075, made up of unpaid notice pay, loss of holiday pay during the notice period, loss of pension contributions, and a 25% uplift under section 207A. | Upheld | — | £6,075 |
| Holiday pay | The claimant also sought holiday pay said to have accrued before dismissal. The tribunal said the evidence on that point was extremely vague and made no award. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,075
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- repudiatory breach of contract
- fundamental breach of contract
- ACAS Code
- section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.