Case 1300611/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For v Kayz Days LLP — 2019
- Case reference
- 1300611/2019
- Decision date
- 30 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gaskell Signed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mrs Jacqueline Freeman and Miss Sarah Hardware were each dismissed by the respondent, Kayz Days LLP, on 31 August 2018 by reason of redundancy. The hearing was in Birmingham on 9 July 2019 before Employment Judge Gaskell, with both claimants appearing in person and no appearance for the respondent.
The judgment recorded that Mrs Freeman was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,860 and Miss Hardware was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,233.40. No other substantive claims or liability findings are set out in the written record provided, and the decision notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | First claimant, Mrs Jacqueline Freeman, was found to have been dismissed by reason of redundancy on 31 August 2018 and was awarded £4,860. | Upheld | — | £4,860 |
| Redundancy | Second claimant, Miss Sarah Hardware, was found to have been dismissed by reason of redundancy on 31 August 2018 and was awarded £1,233.40. | Upheld | — | £1,233 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,093
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.