Case 1300615/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Red Recruitment Consultants Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1300615/2019
- Decision date
- 11 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Sent
- Panel members
- Mr N Forward, Ms J Keene
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Birmingham on 11 November 2019, Employment Judge Self, sitting with Mr N Forward and Ms J Keene, heard the Claimant in person and noted that the Respondent did not attend. The tribunal determined the claims on the papers and made declarations and awards in the Claimant's favour.
The tribunal declared that the Respondent was in breach of Regulation 5 of the Agency Worker Regulations 2010 and ordered payment of £2,388.57 gross, subject to appropriate tax and national insurance deductions. It also found that the Claim for unpaid holiday pay was well founded and ordered payment of £216.44 gross, again subject to appropriate deductions.
The tribunal further found that there had been an unlawful deduction from wages and ordered payment of £802.90 gross, subject to appropriate tax and national insurance deductions. The judgment records a total gross sum of £3,407.91 less appropriate tax and national insurance deductions in settlement of the claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agency worker regulations | The tribunal declared a breach of Regulation 5 of the Agency Worker Regulations 2010. | Upheld | — | £2,389 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claim for unpaid holiday pay well founded. | Upheld | — | £216 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found there had been an unlawful deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £803 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,408
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.