Case 1300619/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Bedford, Claimant’s mother For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 1300619/2018
- Decision date
- 26 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harding
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mrs Bedford, Claimant’s mother For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Birmingham before Employment Judge Harding, recorded that the claimant's claim of constructive unfair dismissal succeeded. The judgment does not set out the factual findings or legal reasoning in the extracted text provided, but it clearly records success on that claim.
No remedy was determined in this judgment. Instead, the tribunal directed that a remedy hearing would take place on 15 and 16 October 2019, with a separate order to follow. The extracted text contains no award figures and no split between basic, compensatory, or other heads of loss.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's claim of constructive unfair dismissal succeeds. No separate monetary award is recorded in this written judgment; remedy was listed for a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.