Case 1300636/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Gater v The Best Connection Group Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1300636/2021
- Decision date
- 24 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Faulkner
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Gater
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment of Employment Judge Faulkner sitting alone at Midlands West on 22, 23 and 24 August 2022. The Claimant was Mr M Gater and the Respondent was The Best Connection Group Limited. The tribunal recorded that the Claimant's complaint of breach of contract was dismissed upon withdrawal, and that his reference to the tribunal to determine his written particulars of employment was also dismissed upon withdrawal.
The tribunal further held that the Claimant was not unfairly dismissed. It stated that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded. No monetary award was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the complaint of breach of contract was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal recorded a separate reference to determine the Claimant's written particulars of employment, and said it was also dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the Claimant was not unfairly dismissed and said the complaint was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.