Case 1300641/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs Peaches Scott v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust FINAL HEARING — 2023

Case reference: 1300641/2021
Decision date: 18 April 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Camp Members
Venue: Birmingham
Panel members: Mr P Wilkinson, Mrs J Keene

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs Peaches Scott

Respondent

University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust FINAL HEARING

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At the final hearing in Birmingham on 18 April 2023, Employment Judge Camp sitting with Mr P Wilkinson and Mrs J Keene heard the respondent's application to strike out the claim under rules 37(1)(a), (b) and/or (e). The tribunal refused that application except for the limited order in paragraph 2.

The tribunal struck out any claim for compensation other than damages for injury to feelings. The written record states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No substantive liability findings or monetary award are recorded in the written judgment.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Race discrimination	The respondent's application to strike out the claim was refused except that any claim for compensation other than damages for injury to feelings was struck out under rule 37(1)(b) and/or (e). The written record does not contain a merits decision.	Other	Race	—
Unfair dismissal	The respondent's application to strike out the claim was refused except that any claim for compensation other than damages for injury to feelings was struck out under rule 37(1)(b) and/or (e). The written record does not contain a merits decision.	Other	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.