Case 1300674/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss B Parmar v Bluebird Care Birmingham North — 2020
- Case reference
- 1300674/2019
- Decision date
- 20 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss B Parmar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 37 strike-out judgment in the claim brought by Miss B Parmar against Bluebird Care Birmingham North. Employment Judge Johnson recorded that the claim was struck out on 20 July 2020.
The tribunal said that by letter dated 21 June 2019 the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the claimant had not responded to the tribunal's letter dated 28 May 2019, the claim had not been actively pursued, and the claimant did not attend the tribunal hearing listed for Friday 21 June 2019.
The tribunal found that the claimant had failed to make written representations, or had not made any sufficient representations, explaining why the claim should not be struck out, and had not requested a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. No monetary remedy was awarded or recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment is a Rule 37 strike-out judgment and does not state the substantive underlying claim type in the text provided. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.