Case 1300688/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Mr Evans, Managing Director — 2021
- Case reference
- 1300688/2021
- Decision date
- 10 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harding Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms Evans, brought a claim against Envirotech Building Services for unlawful deduction from wages under sections 13 and 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The case was heard at Birmingham on 10 August 2021 by Employment Judge Harding, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr Evans, Managing Director.
The tribunal's judgment states that the claim failed. It records in clear terms that the unlawful deduction from wages claim was dismissed.
No monetary award was made, and the judgment does not record any separate remedy or apportionment of compensation. The extracted text contains no further factual findings or legal analysis beyond the dismissal of the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claim of unlawful deduction from wages, contrary to sections 13 and 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- sections 13 and 23 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.