Case 1300693/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J White v Medicine First Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1300693/2021
- Decision date
- 23 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J White
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis Rule 52 judgment on withdrawal was issued by Employment Judge Dean on 23 August 2021. The tribunal recorded that Mrs J White's complaints of unpaid wages, damages for notice pay, and failure to consult in breach of Regulations 13 and 15 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant.
The judgment does not make any findings on the merits of those complaints and does not record any remedy award for them. It states that the claimant's remaining claim(s) would proceed to an Open Preliminary Hearing on 21 January 2022.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the complaint of unpaid wages was dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the complaint for damages for notice pay was dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The judgment states that the complaint of failure to consult in breach of Regulations 13 and 15 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 was dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.