Case 1300701/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J. Newman – Solicitor acting as Lay Representative For the v Mr S.Yeates – HR Director — 2022
- Case reference
- 1300701/2021
- Decision date
- 6 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Algazy Q.C
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J. Newman – Solicitor acting as Lay Representative For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Birmingham by CVP on 6 January 2022 before Employment Judge Algazy QC, the Tribunal recorded that terms of settlement had been agreed between Mr P. Harris and Johnson Cars Limited. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on the underlying claims.
The Tribunal ordered that the case be stayed for 15 days, until 16:00 on 21 January 2022, for implementation of the settlement. It further stated that, unless either party applied for the matter to be relisted during that period, the claim would be dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant at the expiry of the 15-day period. No monetary award was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Terms of settlement were recorded on 6 January 2022; the judgment does not determine the merits of the unfair dismissal claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Terms of settlement were recorded on 6 January 2022; the judgment does not determine the merits of the wage deduction claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Terms of settlement were recorded on 6 January 2022; the judgment does not determine the merits of the working time claim. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.