Case 1300702/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Hollins v Single Resource Limited and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 1300702/2022
- Decision date
- 19 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dimbylow Appearances
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr J Hollins
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe preliminary hearing took place remotely by telephone at Birmingham on 19 July 2022 before Employment Judge Dimbylow. The claimant appeared in person, the first respondent was represented by a solicitor, and the second respondent was represented by counsel.
The judgment records that, by consent, the claims against both respondents were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment gives no findings on the merits of the claims and makes no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claims against both respondents were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. The unfair dismissal classification follows the gov.uk listing category rather than wording in the judgment itself. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records that the claims against both respondents were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. The whistleblowing/public interest disclosure classification follows the gov.uk listing category rather than wording in the judgment itself. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.