Case 1300713/2022 · Employment Tribunal
No appearance For the v Ms P.Wellock — 2022
- Case reference
- 1300713/2022
- Decision date
- 22 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Algazy KC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No appearance For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss L Jones’s case against Simple Green Energy Ltd was listed for a hearing at Birmingham by telephone on 22 December 2022 before Employment Judge Algazy KC. The claimant did not appear. The respondent was represented by Ms P. Wellock.
The tribunal’s judgment states that the claim was dismissed because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant had failed to appear at the hearing. The judgment does not record any findings on the merits of the underlying complaint or any compensation award.
The extracted judgment does not separately set out individual causes of action in its dispositive paragraph. The dismissal therefore appears to dispose of the proceedings as a whole, on non-attendance and lack of pursuit rather than on a substantive determination of the factual issues.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not identify this claim separately in the operative part; the tribunal states only that 'the claim' is dismissed because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant failed to appear. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify this claim separately in the operative part; the tribunal states only that 'the claim' is dismissed because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant failed to appear. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.