Case 1300729/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Roberts Mrs C Edginton Mrs T Mayo Mrs L Williams v AGL Realisations Ltd (in liquidation) and 2 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 1300729/2021
- Decision date
- 11 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mrs T Roberts Mrs C Edginton Mrs T Mayo Mrs L Williams
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 21 May 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make written representations, or request a hearing, on why the claims should not be struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success. The judgment records that the claimants failed to make representations in writing, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claims. The judgment does not make any merits findings on the underlying issues and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Struck out with the linked claims after the claimants did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. The judgment does not separately analyse this category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Protective award matter on the case record; struck out on the same basis. The judgment does not set out a separate merits analysis. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.