Case 1300771/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Custom IT Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1300771/2022
- Decision date
- 8 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kenward
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Kenward, sitting alone, heard the case on 7 April 2022. The respondent did not attend. The tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment and ordered the respondent to pay £1,522.62.
The tribunal also found that the respondent was in breach of contract because it dismissed the claimant without giving the full notice period to which he was entitled. Damages for that breach were assessed at £2,199.38 gross.
On the wages and holiday claims, the tribunal found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay the claimant in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday, and ordered £101.50 gross. It also found an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered a further £938.89 gross.
The total ordered to be paid by the respondent was £4,762.39, being the sum of the four awards set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,523 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent breached contract by dismissing the claimant without the full notice period to which he was entitled; damages were awarded gross. | Upheld | — | £2,199 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal described this as an unauthorised deduction from wages arising from failure to pay in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday; awarded gross. | Upheld | — | £102 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment found an unlawful deduction from wages and awarded the amount stated; no further factual basis is given in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | £939 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,762
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.