Case 1300811/2021 · Employment Tribunal
M.E.Tulumen v Davut Cagiran — 2022
- Case reference
- 1300811/2021
- Decision date
- 3 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Algazy QC
- Venue
- Birmingham via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
M.E.Tulumen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Birmingham via CVP on 3 February 2022 before Employment Judge Algazy QC. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim was struck out because the claimant did not have the requisite qualifying service.
The Tribunal also held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the unlawful deductions from wages claim because it was not presented within the time limit in section 23(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. No liability findings were made on the substance of either claim, and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal said the claimant did not have the requisite qualifying service. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim because it was not brought within the time limit in section 23(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.