Case 1300819/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P McCallum v Lisa Baker — 2022
- Case reference
- 1300819/2022
- Decision date
- 26 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dimbylow Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P McCallum
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was decided under Rule 21 after the respondent did not present a response defending the claim within the relevant time limit. The judgment records that, having regard to Rule 21, Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, the tribunal determined the claim on the material before it without a defended hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £774.00.
The judgment states that the sums payable are gross amounts and that the claimant is responsible for any income tax and National Insurance contributions due on them. No other claims, remedies, or legal tests are recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment entered because the respondent did not present a response defending the claim within the relevant time limit. | Upheld | — | £774 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £774
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.