Case 1300822/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Moreleigh v Ricoh UK Products Ltd Heard: in private by CVP — 2022
- Case reference
- 1300822/2021
- Decision date
- 11 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hindmarch Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Moreleigh
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant's redundancy payment, notice payment, and holiday pay claims were dismissed on withdrawal. No substantive findings were given on those claims beyond the fact of withdrawal.
The remaining complaint of unfair dismissal was considered and found not well founded. The tribunal therefore dismissed the unfair dismissal claim.
The judgment contains no award of compensation or other monetary remedy, and it does not record any separate breakdown of sums. It is a short decision issued by Employment Judge Hindmarch on 11 January 2022 after hearings on 10 and 11 January 2022.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the redundancy payment claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the notice payment claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the holiday pay claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal complaint was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.