Case 1300823/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs W Harris v -v- OCS Group UK Limited FINAL MERITS HEARING — 2019
- Case reference
- 1300823/2018
- Decision date
- 2 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry Members
- Panel members
- Mrs B Hicks, Mr J Sharma
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs W Harris
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that there was no contravention of Part 5 of the Equality Act 2010 and that the claimant had not been subjected to direct discrimination under s.13 or a failure to make reasonable adjustments under ss.20-22. The disability discrimination complaints were therefore dismissed.
The tribunal also dismissed the claimant's complaint that she had been constructively and unfairly dismissed, finding that it was not well founded. It further dismissed the complaint of unlawful deduction from wages in relation to sick pay or holiday entitlement.
A separate complaint that the respondent was in breach of its duty under s.1(1) and/or 4(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, together with the request for an award under s.38 of the Employment Act 2002, was also dismissed. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found there was no contravention of Part 5 of the Equality Act 2010 and no discrimination under ss.13 or 20-22. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The complaint that the claimant was constructively dismissed was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint that the claimant was unfairly dismissed was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held there was no unlawful deduction from wages in relation to sick pay or holiday entitlement. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The claim that the respondent was in breach of its duty under s.1(1) and/or 4(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and that an award should be made under s.38 of the Employment Act 2002, was also dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- Part 5 Equality Act 2010
- ss.13 and 20-22 Equality Act 2010
- Part II Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.1(1) and/or 4(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.