Case 1300852/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Hall v CMT Engineering Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1300852/2019
- Decision date
- 7 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Hall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a strike out judgment in Miss M Hall v CMT Engineering Limited, case number 1300852/2019. The judgment records that by letter dated 31 August 2019 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.
The stated bases for strike out were that the claimant had not complied with an order of the Tribunal and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Cookson ordered that the claim be struck out on 7 October 2019. The judgment does not record any substantive liability findings or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the substantive claim type(s); it only records that the claim was struck out under rule 37 for non-compliance with an order and/or because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.