Case 1300854/2022 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Brett Edwards Enterprises Ltd and B Edwards — 2025
- Case reference
- 1300854/2022
- Decision date
- 19 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kenward
- Panel members
- Mrs M Gola, Mr C Greatorex
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting at Birmingham by video on 19 June 2025 before Employment Judge Kenward with Mrs M Gola and Mr C Greatorex, heard the claimant in person; the respondent did not attend. The complaint of breach of contract for notice pay was well-founded, and the respondent was ordered to pay £142.56 in damages, calculated on gross pay to reflect that the sum is likely to be taxed as Post Employment Notice Pay.
The complaint in respect of holiday pay was also well-founded: the Tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay the claimant for holidays accrued but not taken at the date her employment ended, and ordered the respondent to pay £1,056.72, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance.
The Tribunal dismissed the complaint of an alleged failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. The judgment expressly states that it does not apply to the claimant's other complaints, proceedings in respect of which continue.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim well-founded; £142.56 awarded as damages, calculated on gross pay to reflect likely tax on Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £143 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay accrued but untaken holiday on termination; £1,056.72 awarded, with claimant responsible for tax/NI. | Upheld | — | £1,057 |
| Other | Complaint of alleged failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars was dismissed. Mapped to 'other' as the §4.4 taxonomy has no dedicated category for s.1 ERA written particulars. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,199
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.