Case 1300876/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Mr P Clark, solicitor v Respondent — 2022

Case reference: 1300876/2021
Decision date: 19 August 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Broughton
Venue: Birmingham
Panel members: Mrs S Bannister, Mr D Mcintosh

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

Mr P Clark, solicitor

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The judgment records that Mr S Ireland’s claims of unfair dismissal and age discrimination succeeded at the liability stage. It also records that his claim of automatic unfair dismissal failed. The hearing took place at Birmingham on 16 to 19 August 2022 before Employment Judge Broughton, with Mrs S Bannister and Mr D Mcintosh as the lay members.

No reasons for the liability outcomes are set out in the extracted text. The judgment instead states that there will be a remedy hearing on 2 November 2022, so no monetary award is recorded in this decision.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

This case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The tribunal recorded that the Claimant’s claim of unfair dismissal succeeded.	Upheld	—	—
Age discrimination	The tribunal recorded that the Claimant’s age discrimination claim succeeded.	Upheld	Age	—
Unfair dismissal	The tribunal recorded that the Claimant’s claim of automatic unfair dismissal failed.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.