Case 1300877/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Yates v Tesco Stores Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1300877/2018
- Decision date
- 27 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Monk
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Yates
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant withdrew the claim. The proceedings were dismissed following that withdrawal under rule 52.
The judgment does not set out any findings on the merits of the complaint, does not particularise the claims beyond the case listing categories, and makes no award of compensation or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category, as the judgment text itself does not particularise the claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category, as the judgment text itself does not particularise the claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category, as the judgment text itself does not particularise the claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.