Case 1300893/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 1300893/2021
- Decision date
- 6 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Dr G Hammersley, Mr K Hutchinson
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Birmingham before Employment Judge Gaskell with members Dr G Hammersley and Mr K Hutchinson, heard the case on 3 to 6 October 2022. The claimant, Mr M Smith, appeared in person and the respondent, Tesco Stores Limited, was represented by counsel.
The only claim recorded in the written judgment was a detriment claim under section 146(1)(b) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The tribunal's unanimous decision was that the claim was not well-founded.
The claim was therefore dismissed. No remedy was awarded and the written record does not identify any monetary sum or separate compensation figures.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal dismissed the claimant's detriment claim brought under section 146(1)(b) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 146(1)(b) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.