Case 1300903/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Connor Addis v Lemaca Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1300903/2022
- Decision date
- 21 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Findlay
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Connor Addis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment under rule 37. The tribunal struck out the claimant's claim under the Human Rights Act 1998 and any other complaints of disability discrimination or otherwise, except for one allegation that remained in the case.
The surviving allegation was the complaint that the respondent failed to make a reasonable adjustment by having a provision, criterion or practice that staff should telephone to report absence from work. The judgment does not determine the merits of that remaining allegation.
No remedy was awarded in this judgment, because it dealt only with strike-out and left the listed reasonable-adjustment allegation outstanding.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment struck out the claimant's claim under the Human Rights Act 1998. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment struck out the claimant's disability discrimination complaints, except for the allegation that the respondent failed to make a reasonable adjustment by having a provision, criterion or practice that staff should telephone to report absence from work. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.