Case 1300905/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Griffiths v Whitbread Group plc — 2022
- Case reference
- 1300905/2021
- Decision date
- 21 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flood Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Griffiths
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant resigned after disciplinary and grievance processes arising from allegations about allowing a non-employee behind hotel reception during a power cut, refusing or failing to follow instructions about asking guests to book breakfast, and a later complaint that she had made comments about a guest's sexual orientation. She alleged these matters, and the handling of her grievance and disciplinary process, amounted to breaches of the implied term of trust and confidence.
The tribunal found that the respondent was entitled to investigate the power cut and breakfast booking issues, and that the investigation meetings did not amount to a breach of contract. It also found that the disciplinary meeting had not been deliberately arranged for a date when the claimant could not attend, that the grievance and appeal were conducted in a broadly fair and reasonable manner, and that delay in progressing the disciplinary process was unfortunate but not a fundamental breach.
The tribunal found that the later complaint about alleged comments concerning sexual orientation was serious and required investigation. It did not accept that the complaint had been shown to be fabricated, and found the investigation by an independent manager was reasonable and thorough. Viewed individually and cumulatively, the matters relied on did not amount to conduct calculated or likely to destroy or seriously damage trust and confidence, so the claimant was not constructively dismissed and the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment describes the complaint as constructive unfair dismissal. The tribunal found that the claimant was not constructively dismissed and therefore the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
12 references- s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) Limited v Sharp
- Malik v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA
- Omilaju v Waltham Forest London Borough Council
- Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
- Selkent Bus Co Limited v Moore
- Remploy Ltd v Abbott
- Ladbrokes Racing Ltd v Traynor
- ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.