Case 1300932/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Abid Hussain v The Co-Operative Group Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 1300932/2017
- Decision date
- 11 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cocks Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Abid Hussain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing concerned whether the claimant's direct race and direct disability discrimination claims for the period from June/July 2015 to 9/10 May 2016 were out of time and, if so, whether it would be just and equitable to allow them to proceed. Other disability-related claims concerning reasonable adjustments and discrimination arising from disability were subject to deposit orders and were not determined on limitation at this stage.
The tribunal found that the direct discrimination allegations were clearly out of time. It considered whether there was conduct extending over a period but found no evidence of a continuing course of directly discriminatory treatment because of race or disability during the relevant gap, noting that different personnel were involved and that there was a clear break.
On the just and equitable extension issue, the tribunal accepted that the claimant did not know about tribunal time limits until 22 November 2016, but found no good explanation for the further delay until 30 March 2017 while he was legally represented. It also considered prejudice to the respondent and the merits of the direct race discrimination claim, concluding that the race claim should not continue and recording that the direct disability discrimination claim was also clearly out of time with no basis shown for it continuing over a period.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination allegations for July 2015 to 9/10 May 2016 were found to be out of time. The tribunal declined to extend time and dismissed the claim for lack of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination allegations for June 2015 to 9/10 May 2016 were found to be out of time. The judgment records that no basis was shown for treating the claim as continuing over a period; the final disposal wording is less explicit than for race, so confidence is slightly reduced. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- just and equitable extension of time
- conduct continuing over a period
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.