Case 1300948/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Talbot v Mr R Lubkowski and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 1300948/2021
- Decision date
- 7 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp Appearances
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr K Talbot
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 3 November 2021 before Employment Judge Camp, the parties agreed that all complaints against the first respondent, Mr Lubkowski, and all complaints against the second respondent other than victimisation complaints under the Equality Act 2010 were dismissed upon withdrawal in accordance with rules 51 and 52. The written record does not break the withdrawn complaints down further.
The tribunal also recorded that no part of the claim was struck out and no deposit order was made on the basis of the facts and matters set out in paragraphs 17 to 19 of the respondents' Grounds of Response. The note to the decision states that oral reasons were given for paragraph 2 and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | By consent, all and any complaints whatsoever against the first respondent, Mr Lubkowski, were dismissed upon withdrawal in accordance with rules 51 and 52. The judgment does not itemise the complaints further. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rules 51 and 52 of the Rules of procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.