Case 1300962/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr David Lane v Ministry of Defence — 2019
- Case reference
- 1300962/2018
- Decision date
- 29 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Woffenden Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr David Lane
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant alleged that he had a longstanding disability, described as post-viral syndrome, ME or chronic fatigue syndrome, and that the respondent had failed to make reasonable adjustments between October 2016 and January 2018. The respondent conceded disability by reason of anxiety only from 19 May 2018, but disputed disability before then and disputed that post-viral syndrome or CFS met the statutory definition during the relevant period.
The tribunal found that the claimant had post-viral fatigue in childhood, but that the substantial adverse effects on normal day-to-day activities had ceased many years earlier. It found insufficient evidence that CFS was likely to last for life, likely to recur or fluctuate, or that the symptoms from October 2016 onwards showed a recurrence or fluctuation of CFS. The tribunal preferred the Chronic Fatigue Clinic's evidence, which did not support a diagnosis of CFS or a recurrence of its effects.
The tribunal found that anxiety was a mental impairment from 19 October 2017 and that the claimant met the statutory definition of disability from 19 May 2018, when the adverse effect could be said likely to last at least 12 months. Depression was first diagnosed after the claimant's resignation and outside the material period. Because the claims all predated the period when the claimant was found to be disabled, they were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The pleaded disability discrimination complaint was a failure to make reasonable adjustments. The tribunal determined the claimant was not a disabled person at the time of the alleged acts, so the claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- Goodwin v Patent Office
- Richmond Adult Community College v McDougall
- SCA Packaging Ltd v Boyle
- Guidance on Matters to be Taken into Account in Determining Questions relating to the Definition of Disability
- Aderemi v London and South Eastern Railway Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.