Case 1300966/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Kosinska v Agco Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1300966/2021
- Decision date
- 3 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Noons Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Kosinska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs A Kosinska brought claims against Agco Limited for wrongful dismissal and breach of contract in relation to her bonus payment. The case was heard at Birmingham Employment Tribunal via CVP on 3 September 2021 before Employment Judge Noons, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel.
The written judgment records that the claimant’s wrongful dismissal claim failed and was dismissed. It also records that the claimant’s breach of contract claim concerning her bonus payment failed and was dismissed.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment. The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note at the end of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim was in relation to the claimant's bonus payment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.