Case 1300967/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Caulwell v Mr I Power — 2022
- Case reference
- 1300967/2022
- Decision date
- 23 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gilroy QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Caulwell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr H Caulwell brought a claim of unlawful deductions from wages against Mr I Power. The tribunal recorded that the relevant deduction date was 25 June 2021 and that ACAS received early conciliation notification on 17 December 2021.
The tribunal held that the claim had been lodged out of time. It was not satisfied that it was not reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented to the tribunal within the primary time limit, including as varied by the Employment Tribunals (Early Conciliation: Exemptions and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2014.
As a result, the claim was dismissed. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was found to have been lodged out of time. The tribunal was not satisfied that it was not reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented within the primary time limit, taking account of the ACAS early conciliation notification received on 17 December 2021 and the date of the unlawful deduction, 25 June 2021. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- not reasonably practicable
- Employment Tribunals (Early Conciliation: Exemptions and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2014
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.