Case 1300978/2022 · Employment Tribunal
MR S GARNER v University Of Wolverhampton — 2022
- Case reference
- 1300978/2022
- Decision date
- 10 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge MURDIN
- Venue
- Birmingham ET
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MR S GARNER
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Murdin sitting alone at Birmingham Employment Tribunal on 10 August 2022. The claimant, Mr S Garner, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by a solicitor.
The tribunal recorded that the complaint had been presented outside the period of three months beginning with the effective date of termination. On that basis, the claimant’s application to extend time for presenting the complaint under section 111(2)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed.
No merits findings on the underlying dismissal complaint were recorded in this decision, and no remedy or compensation was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary hearing only. The claimant’s application to extend time for presenting the complaint under section 111(2)(b) ERA 1996 was dismissed because the complaint had been presented out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 111(2)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.