Case 1301016/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B. Powell v M. Marcus Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1301016/2019
- Decision date
- 11 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge V. Jones Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs B. Powell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs B. Powell brought a claim of unfair dismissal against M. Marcus Ltd. The tribunal heard the case in Birmingham on 11 December 2019 before Employment Judge V. Jones, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr K. Bains, Solicitor.
The written record states that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded and was therefore dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the decision. The record also notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing.
No written reasons are provided in the record unless a request was made within 14 days of the written decision. The judgment does not set out the tribunal's factual findings or legal reasoning beyond the dismissal outcome.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record states that the claim was 'not well-founded' and dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, but no written reasons were provided in the record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.