Case 1301054/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Sidhu v Priority Graphics Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 1301054/2019
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Woffenden
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Sidhu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Woffenden’s judgment dated 29 August 2019 records that the proceedings in case 1301054/2019 were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by Mr S Sidhu. The respondent named in the judgment is Priority Graphics Limited.
The extracted text is a short Rule 52 withdrawal judgment and does not set out the factual allegations, any findings on liability, or any remedy. No monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The short judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The underlying claim type is taken from the case listing categories; the extracted judgment text does not set out further particulars. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The short judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The underlying claim type is taken from the case listing categories; the extracted judgment text does not set out further particulars. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The short judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The underlying claim type is taken from the case listing categories; the extracted judgment text does not set out further particulars. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.