Case 1301057/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Miss S Dunne v Tame Cleaning & Maintenance Ltd — 2022

Case reference: 1301057/2021
Decision date: 18 August 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Meichen Appearances

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss S Dunne

Respondent

Tame Cleaning & Maintenance Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At the hearing on 12 August 2022 before Employment Judge Meichen, sitting by CVP, the tribunal considered only time-limit issues. It found that the unfair dismissal claim had not been made in time, but that it was not reasonably practicable for the claim to be made in time and that it was made within a reasonable period.

The tribunal also found that the discrimination claim had not been made in time, but that it was just and equitable to extend time and that it was just and equitable in all the circumstances to do so. On that basis, the tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to consider the claimant’s claims. The written record contains no merits decision and no monetary award.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment dealt only with limitation and jurisdiction. The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim was not presented in time, but that it was not reasonably practicable for it to be presented in time and that it was made within a reasonable period.	Other	—	—
Race discrimination	The judgment dealt only with limitation and jurisdiction. The tribunal found the discrimination claim was not presented in time, but that it was just and equitable to extend time in all the circumstances.	Other	Race	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.