Case 1301074/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Woodcock v Caremark Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1301074/2021
- Decision date
- 22 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge V Jones Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P Woodcock
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a video hearing in Birmingham on 19 May 2023, Miss P Woodcock did not attend and the respondent, Caremark Ltd, was represented by its CEO, Mr D Glover. The written record states that the judgment was issued by Employment Judge V Jones on 22 May 2023.
The judgment contains no reasons, findings of fact, or remedy calculations. It records only that the claimant's claims are dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment only records that the claimant's claims were dismissed; this head of claim is inferred from the GOV.UK jurisdiction code for the decision. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The written judgment only records that the claimant's claims were dismissed; this head of claim is inferred from the GOV.UK jurisdiction code for the decision. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | This entry represents the written-pay-statement limb referred to in the GOV.UK jurisdiction code; the written record does not isolate it separately. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.