Case 1301131/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Basker v QDos Recruits Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1301131/2019
- Decision date
- 24 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kelly Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Basker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a claim for unlawful deduction from wages against QDos Recruits Limited. The tribunal found that the claim should have been started through the ACAS early conciliation process by 8 February 2019, because the last deduction from wages had been made on 9 November 2018. The early conciliation certificate showed that ACAS received the notification on 14 February 2019, which was outside the primary time limit.
The tribunal noted that it could still hear the claim if it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present it in time and if it was then presented within such further period as the tribunal considered reasonable under section 23(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant said it had not been reasonably practicable because he was trying to resolve the matter directly with the respondent, through informal correspondence and via ACAS, rather than through a formal internal grievance process.
Applying the approach described in Palmer and anor v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council, the tribunal held that the question was whether it had been reasonably feasible to present the claim in time. It found that it was reasonably feasible for the claimant to have made an early conciliation notification before the primary time limit expired, including while he was corresponding informally with the respondent and using ACAS. The claim was therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the ACAS early conciliation notification was received on 14 February 2019, outside the primary time limit; the last deduction from wages was on 9 November 2018. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.23(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Palmer and anor v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council 1984 ICR 372 CA
- not reasonably practicable / reasonably feasible test
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.