Case 1301137/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Chall v Commercial Foods Limtied — 2020
- Case reference
- 1301137/2017
- Decision date
- 18 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hughes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Chall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Hughes determined the claims on the papers. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £5,827.59 net.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, awarding £516.30 in damages. It further found that the respondent had breached contract by failing to pay the claimant's expenses, and ordered £181.30.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £852.92. The amount due to the claimant was then uplifted by £1,916.00 because the respondent failed to provide a statement of particulars of employment. The total sum payable was £9,294.11.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £5,827.59. | Upheld | — | £5,828 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £516.30. | Upheld | — | £516 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent breached contract by failing to pay the claimant's expenses and awarded £181.30. | Upheld | — | £181 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £852.92. | Upheld | — | £853 |
| Other | The amount due was uplifted by £1,916.00 because the respondent failed to provide a statement of particulars of employment. | Upheld | — | £1,916 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,294
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.