Case 1301152/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Lambert v Stuart Franklin Estate Agents Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1301152/2021
- Decision date
- 21 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Faulkner
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Lambert
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Miss E Lambert's claim against Stuart Franklin Estate Agents Ltd. It stated that by letters dated 12 July and 8 November 2023 it had given the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued and because she had not replied to the Tribunal's letters dated 15 October 2021 and 22 January 2022.
The Tribunal found that the claimant had failed to make written representations, had failed to make sufficient representations why strike out should not occur, or had failed to request a hearing. On that basis, it ordered that the claim be struck out. No substantive merits findings or monetary remedy were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and because the claimant did not reply to the Tribunal's letters dated 15 October 2021 and 22 January 2022. The Tribunal had issued letters dated 12 July and 8 November 2023 giving the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.