Case 1301152/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Sabina Gajdosova v O My Chai Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1301152/2022
- Decision date
- 4 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hena Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Sabina Gajdosova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3, did not attend the hearing, and the tribunal proceeded in its absence under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The claimant relied on wage slips, bank statements, email and WhatsApp messages, and oral evidence. The tribunal accepted that she was an employee of the respondent despite the absence of a written contract.
On the wages claim, the tribunal found that no wages had been paid after 8 December 2021 and that the claimant worked through to 3 January 2022. It accepted the claimant's evidence that she worked 126 hours in the relevant period at £9.00 per hour, and held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages by failing to pay wages from 6 December 2021 to 3 January 2022. The amount found due was £1,134 gross.
On the written particulars issue, the tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that she had not been provided with an employment contract or written statement of employment particulars. It therefore awarded additional compensation under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 at two weeks' pay, amounting to £756. The tribunal did not award four weeks' pay, referring to the size of the business and the length of the claimant's employment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages for the period 6 December 2021 to 3 January 2022 and calculated 126 hours at £9.00 per hour, producing £1,134 gross. The order was subject to necessary deductions for tax and NI. | Upheld | — | £1,134 |
| Other | The tribunal awarded additional compensation under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. It awarded two weeks' pay, not four, because of the size of the business and the length of employment. | Upheld | — | £756 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,890
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- rule 47 of the ETR 2013
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.27 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.