Case 1301195/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Ramos v K & C Catering Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1301195/2022
- Decision date
- 4 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Steward Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Ramos
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the West Midlands video hearing on 30 March 2023, before Employment Judge Steward, the respondent did not attend. The written decision records that Ms J Ramos's claims succeeded for unlawful deduction of wages, constructive unlawful dismissal, holiday pay, and loss of statutory rights.
The tribunal ordered K & C Catering Ltd to pay £1,241.83 for unlawful deduction of wages, £1,500 for constructive unlawful dismissal, £4,000 for holiday pay, and £500 for loss of statutory rights. The short written record does not set out separate reasons beyond those orders, and no further remedy breakdown is given in the decision text.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,242 |
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment uses the phrase 'Constructive Unlawful Dismissal'. | Upheld | — | £1,500 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,000 |
| Other | The judgment records a separate award for 'Loss of Statutory Rights'. | Upheld | — | £500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,242
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.