Case 1301218/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jagdeep Singh v Rummy Transport Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1301218/2021
- Decision date
- 25 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Meichen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jagdeep Singh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Jagdeep Singh’s claims for holiday pay and notice pay were withdrawn by him and were dismissed by the tribunal on that basis. The tribunal also refused the respondent’s postponement application and refused the claimant’s application to strike out the response, but those procedural rulings did not affect the substantive outcome on liability.
The tribunal held that Mr Singh was unfairly dismissed by Rummy Transport Ltd. It found that it was not just and equitable to reduce the award for any blameworthy conduct by the claimant, and it further found there was no percentage chance that he could have been fairly dismissed. The respondent was found to have unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code, so a 20% uplift was applied to the compensatory award.
On remedy, the tribunal recorded that the basic award of £2,371.15 was agreed. The compensatory award of £2,342.20 was calculated by reference to 10 weeks’ loss of net pay, less £1,500 earned in temporary work, plus four months’ ongoing loss at £52.50 per week, less £785.76 received as an ex gratia payment on dismissal, plus £98.59 for lost employer pension contributions, with the 20% ACAS uplift included. The tribunal also ordered £350 for loss of statutory rights, bringing the grand total payable to £5,063.35.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claimant withdrew the holiday pay claim; the tribunal dismissed it following that withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claimant withdrew the notice pay claim; the tribunal dismissed it following that withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed. It awarded a basic award of £2,371.15, a compensatory award of £2,342.20, and £350 for loss of statutory rights, with a total of £5,063.35. | Upheld | — | £5,063 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,063
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,371
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,342
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- ACAS Code
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.