Case 1301222/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Ali v G4S Secure Solutions (UK) Limited PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2021
- Case reference
- 1301222/2021
- Decision date
- 1 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Ali
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Camp on 1 October 2021. The respondent was G4S Secure Solutions (UK) Limited. The tribunal heard the claimant in person and the respondent by solicitor. Oral reasons were given; written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record of the decision.
The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal complaint had not been presented within the time limit in section 111(2)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It further found that it was not satisfied that it was not reasonably practicable for that complaint to have been presented within time.
The tribunal also found that the disability discrimination complaints were brought after the end of the time periods set out in sections 123(1)(a) and (b) of the Equality Act 2010. As a result, the claimant’s entire claim failed and was dismissed. No remedy award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Presented outside the time limit in section 111(2)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996; the tribunal was not satisfied that it was not reasonably practicable for the complaint to be presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The disability discrimination complaints were brought after the end of the time periods in sections 123(1)(a) and (b) of the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 111(2)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
- not reasonably practicable
- sections 123(1)(a) and (b) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.