Case 1301225/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Cukierda v Jaguar Land Rover Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1301225/2021
- Decision date
- 25 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Jones Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Cukierda
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims of unfair dismissal, race discrimination and disability discrimination against Jaguar Land Rover Limited. The matter was heard at Birmingham Employment Tribunal on 7 January and 25 February 2022 before Employment Judge J Jones.
The Tribunal struck out all three claims because they were out of time. It held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider them. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing, with no written reasons unless requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The claim was struck out because it was out of time and the Tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction to consider it. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claim was struck out because it was out of time and the Tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction to consider it. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was struck out because it was out of time and the Tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction to consider it. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.