Case 1301257/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Hutchings v 1) Wrenbury Leisure Ltd (in Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation) 2) Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy — 2020
- Case reference
- 1301257/2019
- Decision date
- 28 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Hutchings
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Dean entered a Rule 21 judgment on 28 February 2020. The first respondent, Wrenbury Leisure Ltd (in Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation), was found to have made an unlawful deduction from the claimant’s pay by failing to pay him for 87 hours worked at an hourly rate of £8.11 gross. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £705.57 gross for that claim.
The tribunal also found that the first respondent had failed to pay the claimant in lieu of his accrued holiday entitlement of 13 days. It ordered payment of £649.50 gross for that holiday pay claim. The listed hearing on 22 May 2020 was cancelled. No separate findings or awards are recorded against the second respondent, the Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the first respondent failed to pay the claimant for 87 hours worked at £8.11 gross per hour. | Upheld | — | £706 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the first respondent failed to pay the claimant in lieu of his accrued 'in take entitlement' of 13 days holiday; this appears to mean accrued untaken holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £650 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,355
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.