Case 1301284/2022 · Employment Tribunal
MR HAYDAR JABBAR v Jupiter Recruitment Corporation Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1301284/2022
- Decision date
- 16 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N. Clarke
- Venue
- CVP
- Panel members
- Mr K. Palmer, Ms J. Whitehill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MR HAYDAR JABBAR
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn the Employment Tribunal at CVP on 14, 15 and 16 June 2023, before Employment Judge N. Clarke sitting with Mr K. Palmer and Ms J. Whitehill, the claimant, Mr Haydar Jabbar, brought disability discrimination claims against Jupiter Recruitment Corporation Limited. The tribunal recorded claims under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010, failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21, and harassment related to disability under section 26.
The tribunal dismissed those disability discrimination claims. It also recorded that the breach of contract claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment contains no monetary award and no separate remedy findings.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal dismissed the disability discrimination claims brought under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010, failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21, and harassment related to disability under section 26. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.