Case 1301296/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 1301296/2022
- Decision date
- 27 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham via CVP
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr Singh's claim of unfair dismissal was well founded and therefore succeeded. The written judgment records no other substantive liability claims, and the decision was given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided in the record supplied here.
On remedy, the tribunal directed a 50% deduction from both the basic award and compensatory award to reflect contributory fault. It expressly stated that there would be no Polkey deduction. The case was listed for a separate remedy hearing on 24 April 2023 by CVP for one day.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal claim was well founded. It directed a 50% deduction from the claimant's basic and compensatory award to reflect contributory fault, and made no Polkey deduction. A remedy hearing was listed for 24 April 2023 by CVP. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.