Case 1301319/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Mistry v Eon UK plc — 2023
- Case reference
- 1301319/2022
- Decision date
- 11 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kelly
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Mistry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 11 September 2023, Employment Judge Kelly sat alone and gave judgment orally. The issue addressed in the written judgment was the claimant's disability status for Equality Act 2010 purposes. The tribunal held that the claimant did not have a disability at the relevant time by reason of the medical condition of stress, anxiety and depression.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal decided a preliminary disability-status issue. It held that the claimant did not have a disability for Equality Act 2010 purposes at the relevant time by reason of stress, anxiety and depression, but recorded the respondent's concession that the claimant did have a disability by reason of dyslexia, so the disability discrimination claims were not dismissed in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.