Case 1301392/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs W Roj v Pacifica Appliance Services Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 1301392/2025
- Decision date
- 12 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kight Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs W Roj
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mrs W Roj's complaint of unfair dismissal had not been presented within the applicable time limit, but that it had not been reasonably practicable to present it within that period. It found that the complaint was presented within a further reasonable period and directed that it would proceed.
The tribunal also found that the disability discrimination complaint had not been presented within the applicable time limit, but that it was just and equitable to extend time. That complaint will therefore proceed. The judgment did not determine the merits of either complaint and recorded no remedy or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal determined only the preliminary time-limit issue. The complaint will proceed; its merits were not adjudicated. | Other | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal determined only the preliminary time-limit issue. The complaint will proceed; its merits were not adjudicated. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.